Board certified physical therapist with 8 years’ experience in orthopedic and assisted living geriatric rehabilitation. Sensitive caregiver for seniors in post-op recovery and long-term rehabilitation, awarded Excellence in Care in 2015 by the American Physical Therapy Association. Compassionate listener and proactive leader with experience in ICU and assisted living facilities.
Doctor of Physical Therapy, 2007
University of Arizona, Phoenix
Bachelor of Science, Health Sciences, 2005
Drexel University, Philadelphia
Yes. Notice how the example clearly illustrates the candidate’s skills and training credentials using bullet lists. In the skills section, the list includes a combination of hard, field-specific qualifications as well as “soft” traits that emphasize valuable personal qualities. Additionally, the listed items in the education and professional affiliations sections provide detailed professional credentials.
You bet. The summary section provides a well-balanced combination of professional and personal attributes and achievements. In the example, the resume writer uses concise language to convey pertinent and detailed information in a limited space. The writer touches upon previous work experience, special accomplishments, such as the Excellence in Care Award, and hirable skills, all in fewer than four lines.
Yes. In the sample resume, the writer incorporates hard numbers to support her achievements, including the number of patients seen, training hours undergone and patient participation rates. Employers look for this kind of information because it’s an objective way to compare the qualifications of two candidates. The more precise you can be, the more persuasive you are.
Definitely. Notice how few complete sentences there are and the number of bullet lists. The formatting is simple and easy to read, allowing employers to scan quickly and retain information. Direct, concise language can go a long way when you only have six seconds.
Without a doubt. The resume writer uses a unique action verb to start each item in her work history. This kind of language is much more direct and precise than generic verb phrases such as “worked on” or “was responsible for.”